The Financial Encyclopedia · Research Division
Feature Research · June 2026 · Photonics & AI Infrastructure
Special Feature · Technology & Markets

The Photonics Revolution:
How Nvidia Is Betting
Light Powers the Next
AI Leap

For decades, the industry relied on copper traces to move data between chips. At the speeds modern AI systems demand, however, copper wires heat up, lose signal, and require so much circuitry just to recover that signal that the power bill becomes unsustainable. Not only is the industry converging on light to solve this bottleneck, but the transition is already unfolding rapidly across the market. Backed by an $81 billion addressable market and validated by NVIDIA's recent strategic lock-ins, the shift from electrical to optical interconnects is no longer a future story. The real challenge now lies in identifying which companies will capture this value, and whether the broader macroeconomic environment will allow the buildout to continue uninterrupted.

Photonics TAM (2027E)$81B — Goldman Sachs
Technology StageValidated, Early Deployment
Lead SponsorNvidia (NVDA)
Our PositioningDiversified — Full Stack Exposure
$81B
Photonics in AI — TAM by 2027E (GS)
63M
800G+ Transceivers Projected Shipments (2026E)
$4B
Nvidia Strategic Lock-in (Lumentum & Coherent)
>2027
EML Laser Allocations Fully Booked
3
Interconnect Domains: Scale-Up, Out, Across
01

The Fastest Skeptic-Slayer in History

Let us briefly review how we arrived at this point. For years, the general consensus in tech was that software was king and hardware was merely a commodity. Then ChatGPT happened. Suddenly, training and running large language models became one of the highest priorities for every major technology company.

Not only did this flip the narrative on hardware, but it also exposed a fundamental physical constraint. The smarter the AI model, the more data it needs to process, and the faster it needs to move that data around. Hardware is no longer a commodity; it is the bottleneck. And at the center of this bottleneck is the communication between devices.

As AI clusters grow larger, GPUs spread across multiple servers and racks must constantly exchange enormous amounts of data. The distances are longer, the number of communicating chips is vastly larger, and the required speeds are much higher. Copper simply was not designed for this regime.

"Every era of compute has hit a physical ceiling and been rescued by a materials breakthrough. Vacuum tubes to transistors. Transistors to silicon. Silicon scaling to multi-core. Now: copper interconnects to photonics. The pattern is consistent. The question is always timing."

The Financial Encyclopedia — Editorial Analysis
02

The Bottleneck: Why Copper Is Failing AI

To understand why copper is failing, we first need to look at the physics of electrical signals. At high frequencies, electrical current does not travel through the entire cross-section of a copper wire but increasingly concentrates near the surface. This phenomenon, known as the skin effect, causes resistance to rise and signal power to be absorbed as heat.

To put numbers on it: at 56 GHz, a standard copper trace loses around 10% of its signal per centimeter. By the time a signal travels even a few tens of centimeters at these frequencies, it has weakened so severely that you need expensive, power-hungry amplification just to recover it. Furthermore, all that signal energy absorbed by the copper does not disappear but becomes heat. Modern data centers already consume gigawatts of power, a significant portion of which goes into just moving data over copper rather than computing with it.

At the speeds modern AI clusters demand, copper is becoming the weakest link in the entire architecture. This manifests across three distinct domains:

Copper Interconnects

Signal MediumElectrons
Bandwidth CeilingHits wall at 100G/lane+
Energy Per BitHigh — rises with distance
Heat GenerationSignificant at scale
Max Useful DistanceShrinks as speeds increase

Photonic / Optical

Signal MediumPhotons (light)
Bandwidth CeilingVastly higher, wavelength-multiplexed
Energy Per Bit10× lower at equivalent speeds
Heat GenerationMinimal in transmission medium
Max Useful DistanceSame at any speed

Interconnects in data centers can be broadly divided into three domains: scale-up, scale-out, and scale-across. Scale-up connects GPUs directly to one another within a single server. Scale-out links servers through switch ASICs within the same data center. And scale-across connects one geographically separated data center to another.

While scale-up is currently still dominated by electrical interconnects like NVIDIA's NVLink, the thermal burden is exploding as the number of GPUs per server increases. Scale-out already requires optical transceivers, but the "last mile" copper stub between the transceiver and the switch ASIC is the new bottleneck. Scale-across has relied on optical cables for decades, but the demand for bandwidth is pushing the limits of coherent optical communication.

03

The Solution: Sending Data as Light (and the CPO Revolution)

The answer to the copper bottleneck is the optical transceiver. This device converts electrical signals into optical signals for transmission, and converts received optical signals back into electrical signals. The core optical engine inside this transceiver is the Photonic Integrated Circuit (PIC).

However, there is a problem. The switch ASIC, which routes data between GPU servers, still operates on electrical signals. This means that optical signals arriving through optical fiber must be converted into electrical signals before reaching the switch ASIC. The length of this copper segment, which is the distance between the transceiver and the switch ASIC, has a significant impact on scale-out link performance. Light has solved the long-distance segment, but this last electrical segment remains a fundamental constraint.

To address this, the industry is fiercely competing to reduce the physical distance between the switch ASIC and the transceiver. We are currently witnessing a transition through four distinct approaches:

The Evolution of Scale-Out Optics

Pluggable Optics: The current standard. The transceiver module is inserted into a slot at the edge of the switch ASIC board. Easy to replace, but the copper trace from the board edge to the ASIC becomes a massive bottleneck at high speeds.

LPO (Linear Pluggable Optics): Removes the power-hungry DSP from the transceiver, delegating it to the host system. Reduces power and latency, but does not solve the copper distance issue.

NPO (Near-Package Optics): Places the optical engine on the switch ASIC board as an independent module, reducing the copper distance to a few centimeters.

CPO (Co-Packaged Optics): The ultimate solution. Places the optical engine within the exact same package as the switch ASIC, minimizing the copper distance to the absolute minimum. Just as High Bandwidth Memory (HBM) was placed right next to the GPU to reduce the memory bottleneck, placing the optical engine right next to the ASIC minimizes the bottleneck at the electrical-to-optical signal conversion stage.

The Photonics Stack — Where Light Enters the AI Architecture
From data center to chip — the layers where copper is being substituted
Scale-Across
(DCI / Long-Haul)
Coherent Optical — Already mature. Requires DSPs and narrow-linewidth ITLA lasers.
Scale-Out
(Rack to Rack)
Broadcom (AVGO) Coherent (COHR) Lumentum (LITE) Switch ASICs & Optical Engines — Transitioning from Pluggable to CPO.
Scale-Up
(Chip to Chip)
Ayar Labs Nvidia (NVDA) Optical I/O (TeraPHY) — Replacing copper NVLink inside the GPU server.
Laser Sources
& PICs
Lumentum (LITE) Coherent (COHR) Intel (INTC) EMLs, ITLAs, and Silicon Photonics integration (Hybrid/Heterogeneous).
Materials
& Substrates
IQE plc (IQE) Corning (GLW) III-V Epi Wafers (InP, GaAs) and Optical Fiber — the raw material layer.
Stack runs top-down from long-haul to deepest upstream materials. Every layer is necessary. Source: Company disclosures, TrendForce, industry analysis.
04

The "Frankenstein" Physics: Why We Can't Just Build an All-Light Chip

A natural question arises: if light is so superior, why are we still converting electrical signals to light and back again? Why not simply build an all-light GPU? The answer lies in the fundamental band structure of semiconductors.

Silicon, the bedrock of all modern compute, is an indirect bandgap material. When electrons lose energy in silicon, most of that energy is dissipated as heat rather than emitted as light. In contrast, the III-V compound semiconductors used in lasers, such as Indium Phosphide (InP) and Gallium Arsenide (GaAs), are direct bandgap materials that convert electricity into light far more efficiently.

Ultimately, a silicon-based PIC must receive light from a laser built with III-V semiconductors. This creates a massive integration challenge. The industry has developed several approaches to connect these fundamentally different materials into a single system. Hybrid integration, where a separately fabricated III-V laser is aligned and coupled to a silicon PIC, remains the current mainstream approach powering today's AI data centers. Heterogeneous integration, which bonds a III-V wafer directly onto a silicon PIC and forms the laser through lithography, is rapidly gaining attention as the next step to eliminate alignment costs and optical losses.

The Integration Challenge

Not only do these materials differ in their electronic properties, but they also require entirely different manufacturing ecosystems. Behind every optical module lies an enormous industrial chain spanning III-V substrate growth, epitaxial deposition, laser fabrication, and precision optical packaging. NVIDIA understands this physical reality. That is why they are not attempting to build an optical GPU; they are securing the physical supply chain of light.

Companies like Ayar Labs are pushing optical I/O (TeraPHY) directly into GPU servers to replace copper NVLink for Scale-Up, but the core compute remains electrical. The job of photonics in the short-to-medium term is to accelerate electronic compute and connect it more efficiently, not to replace it.

05

The Market: $81 Billion and a Supply Chain Squeeze

According to Goldman Sachs, the total addressable market for photonics in AI infrastructure could reach $81 billion by 2027. But to understand the immediate urgency, we must look at the supply chain.

As investment in AI data centers has exploded, the supply of the core light source used in optical transceivers, specifically Electro-absorption Modulated Lasers (EMLs), has struggled to keep up with demand. Manufacturing 200G/lane EMLs is extraordinarily difficult, and only a handful of companies worldwide can produce them at scale. Due to this severe shortage, some AI data center EML allocations are already booked well beyond 2027.

No matter how many GPUs NVIDIA produces, without the optical modules needed to connect them, a data center cannot be completed. And at the beginning of every optical module is a laser. This is precisely why NVIDIA announced strategic investments of $2 billion each in Lumentum and Coherent in March 2026. These were not simple equity investments. Both deals included commitments to build new manufacturing facilities and long-term purchase agreements, effectively locking in future supply chains.

Photonics in AI — TAM Projection ($B)
Goldman Sachs estimate, market build-up by component layer
GS estimates photonics TAM in AI reaches $81B by 2027. Optical transceivers (CPO and pluggable) and laser components represent the largest near-term layers.
06

The Players: A Full Stack From Fibre to Fab

The photonics supply chain for AI compute is a layered stack. Understanding where each company sits in that stack is essential to understanding both their opportunity and their risk.

Company Ticker Stack Layer Role in AI Photonics Size / Stage
CorningGLW Fibre & Glass Optical fibre — the physical medium. Dominant global supplier. Meta recently signed a $6B contract with them. Large Cap — incumbent
LumentumLITE Lasers & Transceivers EMLs, ITLA (coherent lasers), and hybrid integration. Acquired NeoPhotonics. $2B Nvidia lock-in. Mid Cap
CoherentCOHR Lasers, InP Fabs, PICs World’s first 6-inch InP mass-production platform. Vertically integrated from crystal to transceiver. $2B Nvidia lock-in. Mid Cap
BroadcomAVGO Switch ASICs & CPO Dominant in Scale-Out networking silicon. Tomahawk 6 is pioneering Co-Packaged Optics (CPO). Large Cap
Ayar LabsPrivate Scale-Up Optical I/O TeraPHY chiplets. Pushing optical engines directly into GPU servers to replace copper NVLink. Nvidia backed. Private / High Growth
IntelINTC Silicon Photonics Pioneer in heterogeneous integration (bonding III-V to 300mm Si). Shipping silicon photonics transceivers at scale. Large Cap
IQE plcIQE:LN Materials (Epi Wafers) Compound semiconductor epiwafers (InP, GaAs). The raw material from which photonic chips and laser diodes are made. Small Cap

Every single company listed above is genuinely necessary for what Nvidia is making a reality. The market is large enough for all of them to generate meaningful revenue. But there are significant risks that keep us up at night.

07

Three Concerns Before You Get Excited

The technology is real, the market is validated, and the demand driver is enormous. That should be enough. It rarely is. Let us look more closely at what keeps us up at night.

01
The EML Supply Chain Squeeze

The most immediate bottleneck is not the GPU; it is the laser. Manufacturing 200G/lane EMLs is extraordinarily difficult, and the supply is severely constrained. Not only are allocations for AI data center EMLs booked well beyond 2027, but the manufacturing yield remains a constant challenge. No matter how many GPUs NVIDIA produces, without these lasers, the data centers cannot be built. For the minority shareholder, this means supply constraints could cap revenue growth in the near term, even as demand screams.

02
The CPO Thermal & Yield Trap

Co-Packaged Optics is the holy grail for Scale-Out, but it is a manufacturing minefield. Lasers are exquisitely sensitive to temperature, while switch ASICs are massive heat sources. Placing them in the same package threatens reliability, forcing the use of External Light Sources (ELS) which adds complexity. Furthermore, if the optical engine and the ASIC are packaged together, a defect in either one scraps the entire assembly. This makes Known Good Die (KGD) testing an absolute requirement, driving up costs and complicating the supply chain. CPO is not merely a design change; it requires a fundamental rewiring of the semiconductor manufacturing ecosystem.

03
The Macro Backdrop & The Power Wall

Everything above feeds into a macro environment that is genuinely uncomfortable. US debt-to-GDP has crossed 100%. Inflation is being pushed higher by energy shocks. The Strait of Hormuz has been blocked for over ninety days, and even if it were reopened tomorrow, the infrastructure does not simply normalise overnight. We are looking at elevated oil and gas prices for the foreseeable future.

Expensive energy is a tax on everything, but specifically on data centers. As we move to Scale-Across (Data Center Interconnects), we must use coherent optical communication, encoding data in the phase and polarization of light to overcome latency. This requires massive Digital Signal Processors (DSPs) to reconstruct signals distorted by chromatic dispersion and nonlinear effects over hundreds of kilometers. The power consumption of these coherent DSPs, combined with the thermal load of CPO in Scale-Out, means data centers are hitting absolute power limits. The macro energy crisis directly attacks the marginal economics of building these AI clusters.

The Polymath Problem

While this analysis demands expertise across materials science, semiconductor packaging, and macroeconomics, the hardest part is actually the most human part. No amount of understanding about heterogeneous integration or ITLA lasers helps you when a tanker cannot pass through a strait, oil spikes 40%, and the Federal Reserve is backed into a corner. The technology is tractable. The economy is not.

08

Our Position: Conviction in the Technology, Humility on the Timing

All of the above leads us to a view that sits, deliberately, in the uncomfortable middle ground. We are not going all-in. We are not staying out. And we think both of those positions, held without nuance, would be mistakes.

"I'd advise that no one should go all-in without acknowledging that they face the risk of ruin if things go badly. But by the same token, no one should stay all-out and risk missing out on one of the great technological steps forward."

Howard Marks, Oaktree Capital — recent memo

We align with this framing entirely. These technological developments will happen sooner rather than later. The money to be made is real. But we cannot responsibly ignore the consequences of an oil shock and a data center power wall.

The Financial Encyclopedia — Research Position

Diversified Across the Stack. Comfortable with That.

For all of the above reasons, we have taken a diversified position across the photonics stack, from the raw epiwafers (IQE) to the lasers (Lumentum, Coherent) to the fiber (Corning) and the switching silicon (Broadcom). We could list reasons to concentrate in two or three names. But when it comes to identifying the ultimate winner in a market this early, this fragmented, and this subject to manufacturing yield risks, we believe we would be genuinely overconfident about our own capabilities to know. Diversification, as Charlie Munger observed, is protection against ignorance. In this specific case, we acknowledge our ignorance freely and structure accordingly.

The technology is real. The market will reward it. We just cannot tell you with any honesty exactly when, exactly how, or exactly through which of the names in the stack. So we own a piece of all of them, and we wait.

🌾

The final word: While everyone prices in the next AI phase, food companies, fertiliser producers, and agricultural operators are being priced as though the Strait of Hormuz blockade is an inconvenience rather than a structural supply disruption, and as though the human race has found a way to bypass the requirement to eat. It has not. When the rest of the market is looking through a telescope at AI in 2030, sometimes the best trade is to look down at the ground beneath your feet. We hold positions in both.